MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1831159226 · doi:10.3968/6546

Research on the Initiation Mechanism of Artificial Fracture in the Fractured Reservoir

2015· article· en· W1831159226 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Siqi Li, Yan Tie, Wei Li, Yang Zhang, Kou Hongbin

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in petroleum exploration and development · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydraulic fracturingFracture (geology)Petroleum engineeringGeologyPermeability (electromagnetism)Mechanism (biology)Geotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The low permeability reservoir which has a significant proportion of oil and gas reserves is the focus on mining in the future. Hydraulic fracturing technology is a major means in achieving such reservoir exploitation. In this paper, the initiation mechanism of artificial fracture in the fractured reservoir is studied. Also, the crack condition is given. Then, the influence factors of initiation mechanism of artificial fracture are analyzed and the theoretical models are further verified through the field application. The results show that: for fixed size cracks, the integrating factor decreases with the increasing of the crack spacing; for fixed crack spacing, the integrating factor increases with the increasing of the crack size; for the same d/a, the larger the size of crack is, the more easily crack extends. By studying on the initiation mechanism of artificial fracture of fractured reservoir, provide theoretical basis for hydraulic fracturing technology being applied in low permeability fractured reservoir. So that the efficient development of special oil and gas reservoirs can be achieved. Key words: Fractured reservoir; Artificial fracture; Initiation mechanism; Field application

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.537
Threshold uncertainty score0.239

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in petroleum exploration and developmentSame topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisFrench-language works237,207