MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1831193636 · doi:10.21432/t2988k

Just-in-time online professional development activities for an innovation in small rural schools / Activités de perfectionnement professionnel « juste-à-temps » pour l’innovation dans les petites écoles rurales

2012· article· fr· W1831193636 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Christine Hamel, Stéphane Allaire, Sandrine Turcotte

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Learning and Technology · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation in Rural Contexts
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersMinistère de l'Éducation, du Loisir et du Sport Québec
KeywordsLibrary scienceChristian ministryProfessional developmentDistance educationPolitical scienceHumanitiesICTSSociologyPedagogyInformation and Communications Technology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article describes the just-in-time online professional development offered to teachers in the Remote Networked Schools (RNS), a systemic initiative funded by the Quebec Ministry of Education (Canada), which aims at enriching the learning environment of small rural schools with the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs). The designed experiment method studies the activity identified and the categories of professional development offered by a university-based intervention team (UBIT) over six years of deployment. Cet article décrit le développement professionnel en ligne « juste-à-temps » proposé aux enseignants dans les Écoles Eloignées en Réseau (ÉÉR), une initiative systémique financée par le ministère de l'Éducation du Québec (Canada), et visant à enrichir l'environnement d'apprentissage des petites écoles rurales par l'utilisation des technologies de l'information et de la communication (TIC). La méthode des plans d’expériences étudie l'activité identifiée et les types de développement professionnel offerts par une équipe d'intervention en milieu universitaire pendant six années de développement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2012
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Learning and TechnologySame topicEducation in Rural ContextsFrench-language works237,207