Effects of habitat fragmentation and slope on the distribution of three owl species in the Manitoba Escarpment, Canada - a preliminary analysis.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We examined the attitudes of patients with schizophrenia towards unrestricted independent non-medical prescribing of antipsychotic agents by mental health nurses. Data were collected using the Factors Influencing Neuroleptic Medication Taking Scale with a sample of 81 patients with schizophrenia who lived in the community. The results showed that a small majority supported mental health nurses having prescriptive authority. Younger participants were more likely than older participants to favour these clinicians being permitted to discontinue prescribed medication. Most considered their relationships with mental health nurses as satisfactory, and were satisfied with the way these clinicians responded to their concerns regarding antipsychotic agents. Beliefs about prescribing were positively associated with perceived knowledge of medications. The findings draw attention to patient support for non-medical prescribing by these nurses. They highlight the need for mental health nurses to be properly educated to assume this important role, and the requirement for further research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".