MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1831873369 · doi:10.3968/6455

Effect of Eccentricity on Annulus Pressure of Aerated Drilling

2015· article· en· W1831873369 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nan Zhang, BI Xueliang, Xun Chen, YU Xiaowen, Shan-Shan Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in petroleum exploration and development · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnnulus (botany)Drill stringDrillingDrilling fluidEccentricity (behavior)Petroleum engineeringGeologyAerationGeotechnical engineeringUnderbalanced drillingEccentricMechanicsEngineeringMechanical engineeringMaterials scienceComposite materialLawPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the past two decades, aerated drilling has been applied to improving recovery of the low permeability oil and gas reservoirs at home and abroad. This technology can improve the level of exploration and development, reduce the cost of drilling and protect reservoir. Because of its advantages, aerated drilling has been developed and promoted rapidly. And its theoretical study has also been further developed. In this paper, the impact of the eccentric drill string to annular multiphase fluid in aerated drilling was studied. Based on mathematical solution of eccentric annuli, combined with multiphase flow control equations and flow law, aerated drilling eccentric annulus pressure formula was derived. Under the condition of Concentricity and different degrees of eccentricity, the eccentric annulus pressure were calculated. The distribution law of annulus pressure with depth and the influence law of the eccentricity to annulus pressure were analyzed. Key words: Aerated drilling, Eccentric annuli; Annulus pressure

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in petroleum exploration and developmentSame topicDrilling and Well EngineeringFrench-language works237,207