MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1832475542

Respiratory gating for 3-dimensional PET of the thorax: feasibility and initial results.

2004· article· en· W1832475542 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsHôpital FleurimontCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNuclear medicineCoronal planeGatingRespiratory systemImaging phantomCardiac PETMedicineAmplitudeThorax (insect anatomy)Image qualityScannerBiomedical engineeringPhysicsPositron emission tomographyRadiologyComputer scienceInternal medicineOpticsAnatomyComputer vision
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

UNLABELLED: Respiratory motion may reduce the sensitivity of (18)F-FDG PET for the detection of small pulmonary nodules close to the base of the lungs. This motion also interferes with attempts to use fused PET/CT images through software or combined PET/CT devices. This study was undertaken to assess the feasibility of respiratory gating for PET of the chest and the impact of respiratory motion on quantitative analysis. METHODS: Ten healthy subjects were enrolled in this study. Three-dimensional studies were acquired with 8 gates per respiratory cycle on a commercial PET scanner with a temperature-sensitive respiratory gating device built in-house. All scans were obtained over 42 cm of body length with 3 bed positions of 10 min each after injection of (18)F-FDG at 4.5 MBq/kg. The reconstructed images were assembled to produce gated whole-body volumes and maximum-intensity projections. The amplitude of respiratory motion of the kidneys (as a surrogate for diaphragmatic incursion) as well as the apex of the heart was measured in the coronal plane. Phantom studies were acquired to simulate the impact of respiratory motion on quantitative uptake measurements. RESULTS: The respiratory gating device produced a consistent, reliable trigger signal. All acquisitions were successful and produced reconstructed volumes with excellent image quality. Mean +/- SD motion amplitude and maximal motion amplitude values were 6.7 +/- 3.0 and 11.9 mm for the heart, 12.0 +/- 3.7 and 18.8 mm for the right kidney, and 11.1 +/- 4.8 and 17.1 mm for the left kidney, respectively. In phantom studies, the standardized uptake value for a 1-mL lesion was underestimated by 30% and 48% for the average and maximal respiratory motion values, respectively. CONCLUSION: Respiratory gating of PET of the thorax and upper abdomen is a practical and feasible approach that may improve the detection of small pulmonary nodules. Further work is planned to assess prospectively the diagnostic accuracy of this new method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.796
Threshold uncertainty score0.128

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it