Finite element modeling of lateral pipeline–soil interactions in dense sand
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Finite element (FE) analyses of pipeline–soil interaction for pipelines buried in dense sand subjected to lateral ground displacements are presented in this paper. Analysis is performed — using the Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian (ALE) method available in Abaqus/Explicit FE software — in the plane strain condition using the Mohr–Coulomb (MC) and modified Mohr–Coulomb (MMC) models. The MMC model considers a number of important features and properties of stress–strain and volume change behaviour of dense sand including the nonlinear pre- and post-peak behaviour with a smooth transition and the variation of the angle of internal friction and dilation angle with plastic shear strain, loading conditions (triaxial or plane strain), density, and mean effective stress. Comparing FE and experimental results, it is shown that the MMC model can better simulate the force–displacement response for a wide range of lateral displacements of the pipe for different burial depths, although the peak force on the pipe could be matched using the MC model. Examining the progressive development of zones of large inelastic shear deformation (shear bands), it is shown that the mobilized angle of internal friction and dilation angle vary along the length of the shear band; however, constant values are used in the MC model. A comprehensive parametric study is also performed to investigate the effects of pipeline diameter, burial depth, and soil properties. Many important aspects in the force–displacement curves and failure mechanisms are explained using the present FE analyses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it