MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1832988657 · doi:10.5539/ass.v11n14p161

Place of Private Pension Funds in the Financial Market

2015· article· en· W1832988657 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
N.B. Pochinok, Galina Ivanovna Andryushchenko, Margarita V. Savina, Alexander N. Maloletko

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Social Science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEconomic and Technological Developments in Russia
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPensionPrivate pensionBusinessFinanceLegislatureDelegationPension systemInvestment (military)Global assets under managementGovernment (linguistics)PoliticsEconomicsFinancial systemInstitutional investorCorporate governancePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Contemporary Russian pension system was influenced by the social, economic and demographic factors, astypical in most developed countries and only our country. Development of the pension system only within thestate pension insurance for 20 years has shown its failure, in connection with what has recently acquired greatimportance to private pension funds, the impetus for the development of which was the delegation of functionsto manage pension funds and legislative approval of government guarantees repayment of funds insured personsPrivate pension funds, taking into account potential investment opportunities can take a significant niche in theRussian financial market in solving a number of currently available economic and socio-political problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Social ScienceSame topicEconomic and Technological Developments in RussiaFrench-language works237,207