MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1833043123

Une oppression peut en cacher une autre : antiracisme et sexisme dans Comment faire l’amour avec un Nègre sans se fatiguer de Dany Laferrière

2011· article· fr· W1833043123 on OpenAlexaff
Lori Saint-Martin

Bibliographic record

VenueÉrudit (Université de Montréal) · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican history and culture studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans son premier roman, Comment faire l’amour avec un Nègre sans se fatiguer, Dany Laferrière déploie un discours antiraciste et anticolonialiste rendu possible à la fois par l’effacement narratif des femmes noires et par l’exploitation de stéréotypes sexistes à propos des femmes blanches. Alors qu’il remet en question au moyen de l’intertextualité et de l’ironie, notamment, les stéréotypes touchant le « Nègre », Laferrière reconduit ceux qui touchent la Blanche ; en fait, ce sont ces derniers qui permettent la mise en oeuvre de son discours antiraciste, comme si le racisme justifiait le sexisme. Il en découle une déshumanisation de la femme blanche, un effacement de sa subjectivité qui permet l’affirmation de celle du narrateur. Or, si le racisme est problématique, le sexisme ne l’est pas moins, et il importe de le rappeler.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.617
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉrudit (Université de Montréal)Same topicAfrican history and culture studiesFrench-language works237,207