MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1833403619

Subsistence Trade and World Trade: Gendered Class Struggle in Kenya, 1999-2002

2002· article· en· W1833403619 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Leigh Brownhill, Terisa E. Turner

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian women's studies · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubsistence agricultureCommodificationEconomicsIndependence (probability theory)Free tradeInternational tradeDevelopment economicsEconomyAgricultureGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The inclusion of agriculture in the Genera] Agreement on Trade and Tariffs (GATT) in 1992 and the institutionalization of this agreement in the World Trade Organization in 1995 have put subsistence trade and world trade on a collision course throughout the world. This is no less the case in Kenya where global corporate rule and its violent enforcement have ushered in a new cycle of struggle. This new upsurge embraces most of the issues central to the Kenya Land and Freedom Army or Mau Mau which won Kenya its independence from Britain in 1963. On the one hand corporate rule has led the foreign capitalists and African home guards who enforce commodified production and trade into confrontation with those who are exploited and dispossessed in the process. On the other hand the world trade regime has clarified two distinct positions among the dispossessed who turn to subsistence production and trade in greater numbers as the commodified economy fails to allow most to survive. (excerpt)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.578
Threshold uncertainty score0.849

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0080.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian women's studiesSame topicAgriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207