MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Simulating the γ-ray emission from galaxy clusters: a universal cosmic ray spectrum and spatial distribution

2010· article· en· W1833408884 on OpenAlexaff
Anders Pinzke, Christoph Pfrommer

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsCosmic rayCherenkov radiationFermi Gamma-ray Space TelescopeGalaxy clusterGalaxyPionSpectral energy distributionCompton scatteringGamma rayAstronomyElectronNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Entering a new era of high-energy γ-ray experiments, there is an exciting quest for the first detection of γ-ray emission from clusters of galaxies. To complement these observational efforts, we use high-resolution simulations of a broad sample of galaxy clusters, and follow self-consistent cosmic ray (CR) physics using an improved spectral description. We study CR proton spectra as well as the different contributions of the pion decay and inverse-Compton emission to the total flux and present spectral index maps. We find a universal spectrum of the CR component in clusters with surprisingly little scatter across our cluster sample. When CR diffusion is neglected, the spatial CR distribution also shows approximate universality; it depends however on the cluster mass. This enables us to derive a semi-analytic model for both the distribution of CRs as well as the pion decay γ-ray emission and the secondary radio emission that results from hadronic CR interactions with ambient gas protons. In addition, we provide an analytic framework for the inverse-Compton emission that is produced by shock-accelerated CR electrons and is valid in the full γ-ray energy range. Combining the complete sample of the brightest X-ray clusters observed by ROSAT with our γ-ray scaling relations, we identify the brightest clusters for the γ-ray space telescope Fermi and current imaging air Čerenkov telescopes (IACTs) (MAGIC, HESS, VERITAS). We reproduce the previous result of Pfrommer, but provide somewhat more conservative predictions for the fluxes in the energy regimes of Fermi and IACTs when accounting for the bias of ‘artificial galaxies’ in cosmological simulations. We find that it will be challenging to detect cluster γ-ray emission with Fermi after the second year but this mission has the potential of constraining interesting values of the shock acceleration efficiency after several years of surveying. Comparing the predicted emission from our semi-analytic model to that obtained by means of our scaling relations, we find that the γ-ray scaling relations underpredict, by up to an order of magnitude, the flux from cool-core clusters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.547

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations116
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietySame topicAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207