Analyse didactique des gestes professionnels d’étudiants stagiaires en éducation physique et sportive
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article présente une analyse didactique des gestes professionnels de quatre étudiants stagiaires de troisième année de licence en éducation physique. La recherche prend appui sur la théorie de l’action conjointe et l’approche anthropologique du didactique selon une perspective comparatiste. La méthodologie met en relation des données filmées et issues d’entretien. Les résultats révèlent que les gestes des étudiants se caractérisent par : 1) une centration sur les savoirs spécifiques ; 2) l’actualisation de tensions entre apprentissages, sécurité, dévolution et gestion de la classe ; 3) l’articulation de techniques didactiques variées. La discussion envisage l’influence des enjeux de savoirs sur ces gestes, leur ancrage dans des dilemmes variés ainsi que leurs traits spécifiques et génériques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".