MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1833684988 · doi:10.1007/0-387-23152-8_57

A New Method to Construct the Non-Dominated Set in Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithms

2006· book-chapter· en· W1833684988 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConstruct (python library)Benchmark (surveying)Convergence (economics)Set (abstract data type)Mathematical optimizationComputer scienceAlgorithmGenetic algorithmCluster analysisMulti-objective optimizationMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There have been widespread applications for Multi Objective Genetic Algorithm (MOGA) on highly complicated optimization tasks in discontinuous, multi-modal, and noisy domains. Because the convergence of MOGA can be reached with the non-dominated set approximating the Pareto Optimal front, it is very important to construct the non-dominated set of MOGA efficiently. This paper proposes a new method called Dealer’s Principle to construct non-dominated sets of MOGA, and the time complexity is analyzed. Then we design a new MOGA with the Dealer’s Principle and a clustering algorithm based on the core distance of clusters to keep the diversity of solutions. We show that our algorithm is more efficient than the previous algorithms, and that it produces a wide variety of solutions. We also discuss the convergence and the diversity of our MOGA in experiments with benchmark optimization problems of three objectives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.760
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it