“The quarry proposed by St Marys Cement Inc. for a location near Carlisle, Ontario should not be permitted” : Introduction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The following three papers were developed by one of the three lab sections of ENVS 4300, Environmental Law, in the fall semester of 2010. During the course, students participate in a series of three role playing exercises involving three environmental topics. Over the course of the semester, each student is part of three teams: one that makes a case in support of an assigned environmental proposition, one that makes a case against an assigned environmental proposition and one that conducts an impartial adjudication of a dispute. The two contending teams also cross examine their opponents as part of the process. The following three papers are based on the submissions of the two opposing sides in one of the disputes in the fall semester, 2010, as well as on the adjudicators report. These reports were produced to address the third dispute topic of the semester, “The quarry proposed by the St. Mary’s Cement Company for a location near Carlisle, Ontario, should not be permitted.”
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".