MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1835450443

Genetic determinants of malignancy in a mouse model for oligodendroglioma.

2003· article· en· W1835450443 on OpenAlexaff
William A. Weiss, Michael J. Burns, Christopher S. Hackett, Ken Aldape, John R. Hill, Hiroko Kuriyama, Nagato Kuriyama, Nadezhda Milshteyn, Timothy P. L. Roberts, Michael F. Wendland, Ronald A. DePinho, Mark A. Israel

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOligodendrogliomaGenetically modified mouseCancer researchBiologyChromosomeLoss of heterozygosityMalignancyTransgeneAlleleGeneGeneticsGliomaAstrocytoma
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Oligodendrogliomas of all grades overexpress epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), whereas deletion of ink4a/arf is found only in high-grade tumors. We used the S100 beta promoter to generate transgenic mice expressing v-erbB, a transforming allele of EGFR. These mice developed low-grade oligodendroglioma. Transgenic animals heterozygous for ink4a/arf or p53 developed high-grade tumors. Comparative genomic hybridization revealed loss of distal mouse chromosome 4, a region orthologous with human chromosome 1p, which is commonly lost in oligodendroglioma. Our results demonstrate that overexpression of EGFR, an epigenetic observation of uncertain significance in human oligodendroglioma, can initiate oligodendroglioma in the mouse. Furthermore, p53 pathway mutations can mediate the transition from low to high grade. These models hold promise for studying tumor lineage, identifying contributing genetic alterations and evaluating preclinical therapies in this important neoplasm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.254
Threshold uncertainty score0.340

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations175
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207