MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Levels and Types of Questions Raised by EFL Teachers in Southern Al-Mazar Directorate of Education

2012· article· en· W1835539245 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Majid Mohammed Al-Khataybeh, I’timad Jamil Abdulraheem Al-Ja’freh

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Critical Thinking Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyPedagogyPsychologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aimed at investigating the levels and types of questions raised by EFL teachers in Southern Al-Mazar directorate of Education. The study comprised (12) female/ male teachers. The results of the study showed that; male/female teachers asked (1603) questions; (1290) questions were within the low level and (313) questions were high level. Female/male teachers asked (1603) questions where (393) questions were open and (1210) were ended questions . The results also, showed that female teachers asked (729) questions whereas male teachers asked (874). Also, the results of the study showed that females/ males teachers with high experience asked questions more than those teachers with less experience. In light of the results of the study, the researcher had suggested some recommendations to the concern. Key words : Levels of questions; Types of questions; EFL teachers questions Resume Cette etude visait a etudier les niveaux et types de questions posees par les enseignants EFL dans le sud de Mazar Al-Direction de l’education. L’etude comprenait (12) enseignants de sexe feminin/ masculin. Les resultats de l’etude a montre que, mâle/ femelle des enseignants a demande (1603) des questions; (1290) des questions se situaient dans le bas niveau et (313) questions etaient de haut niveau. Les enseignants des femmes/ hommes a demande (1603) questions ou (393) des questions etaient ouvertes et (1210) ont ete clos questions. Les resultats ont egalement, a montre que les enseignantes demande (729) des questions alors que les enseignants masculins a demande (874). En outre, les resultats de l’etude a montre que les femelles ou les mâles des enseignants ayant une experience de haute pose des questions plus que ces enseignants ayant moins d’experience. A la lumiere des resultats de l’etude, le chercheur a suggere quelques recommandations a la preoccupation. Mots cles : Niveaux de questions; Types de questions; EFL questions d’enseignant

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicEducation and Critical Thinking DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207