MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1835810656 · doi:10.1109/cdc.1992.371183

Regressor based sliding mode control of robotic manipulators

2005· article· en· W1835810656 on OpenAlexafffund
Y. Stepanenko, Cheng Su

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRobustness (evolution)Control theory (sociology)Bounded functionComputer scienceRobot manipulatorController (irrigation)Tracking errorTrajectoryRobotExponential stabilityControl engineeringMathematicsArtificial intelligenceEngineeringControl (management)Nonlinear system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A regressor-based sliding mode controller is presented for robotic manipulators with the consideration of computational efficiency. Three specificities distinguish the controller from the known designs. First, the regressor matrix used by the control law is calculated about the desired trajectory rather than with respect to current robot states. This results in significant simplifications since the regressor can be calculated offline, which makes the controller implementation simple and fast. Second, the authors have proved the global asymptotic stability of the controller, and its robustness with respect to a class of state-dependent uncertainties, which may result, for example, from unmodeled dynamics. This class includes uncertainties which can be bounded by a first degree polynomial of the tracking error and its first derivative. The robustness of the controller with respect to the measurement noise has also been proved. Third, an adaptive version of the controller, also presented, provides a technique for reducing magnitudes of the control signals.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsFrench-language works237,207