Co‐operation of G<sub>sα</sub> and G<sub>βγ</sub> in maintaining G<sub>2</sub> arrest in <i>xenopus</i> oocytes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Progesterone-induced oocyte maturation is thought to involve the inhibition of an oocyte adenylyl cyclase and reduction of intracellular cAMP. Our previous studies demonstrated that injection of inhibitors of G protein betagamma complex induces hormone-independent oocyte maturation. In contrast, over-expression of Xenopus Gbeta1 (xGbeta1), alone or together with bovine Ggamma2, elevates oocyte cAMP and inhibits progesterone-induced oocyte maturation. To further investigate the mechanism of Gbetagamma-induced oocyte maturation, we generated a mutant xGbeta1, substituting Asp-228 for Gly (D228G). An equivalent mutation in the mammalian Gbeta1 results in the loss of its ability to activate adenylyl cyclases. Indeed, co-injection of xGbeta1D228G with Ggamma2 failed to increase oocyte cAMP or inhibit progesterone-induced oocyte maturation. To directly demonstrate that oocytes contained a Gbetagamma-regulated adenylyl cyclase, we analyzed cAMP formation in vitro by using oocyte membrane preparations. Purified brain Gbetagamma complexes significantly activated membrane-bound adenylyl cyclase activities. Multiple adenylyl cyclase isoforms were identified in frog oocytes by PCR using degenerate primers corresponding to highly conserved catalytic amino acid sequences. Among these we identified a partial Xenopus adenylyl cyclase 7 (xAC7) that was 65% identical in amino acid sequence to human AC7. A dominant-negative mutant of xAC7 induced hormone-independent oocyte maturation and accelerated progesterone-induced oocyte maturation. Theses findings suggest that xAC7 is a major component of the G2 arrest mechanism in Xenopus oocytes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".