Bibliographic record
Abstract
Based in large part on primary sources, this collection of essays on American diplomatic history reads well. The chapters on Canada, the Caribbean, and the Baltic states are particularly trenchant. But for a balanced, overall view of presidential leadership, the reader will have to look elsewhere. Franklin D. Roosevelt is portrayed as sympathetic to foreign cultures when in fact few chief executives have been more chauvinistic, his overseas travel and foreign-language study notwithstanding. His trampling of Japanese American rights is defended on the basis of a fear of foreign invasion, while his effort to broker a Munich-like settlement with Adolf Hitler is passed over. One will look in vain for any reference to the way in which he lagged behind public opinion on the issue of defense spending so that the United States wound up woefully unprepared during the critical period 1937–1939 and utterly lacking in diplomatic leverage (Roosevelt went so far as to discourage the British from arming). Winston Churchill's public praise of the president is taken at face value without reference to words of a different sort uttered in private.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".