Operational Costs Optimization in Water Distribution Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pump management and reservoir management have many similarities, and therefore, should ideally be analyzed in an integrated way to plan effectively the daily operation of water distribution systems. Historically, these two management activities have been evolved as separate tasks in energy-efficiency (i.e., energy optimization) studies and are often carried out in an isolated way. The latter being most often associated directly with the concepts of multimodal and multi-objective optimization problems, whereas the former is usually considered as a single optimization problem to be solved. When some single optimization problems appear at part of the solution tied to a local (i.e., regional) search-space (i.e., objective space), this artificial integration (i.e., multi-modal and multi-objective optimization) can always obtain optimal solutions. Similarly when system constraints and load conditions are considered, a set of feasible and innovative optimal solutions can be obtained in order to continue the enhancement of energy consumption that turns into a significant reduction in the overall operational cost (i.e., a potential of 6.24% cost savings) without affecting the level of services provided to the clients in a safe and protected manner.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".