MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1836680644 · doi:10.5380/geografar.v9i2.35671

TRIBUTO A IEMANJÁ:FESTA(S) RELIGIOSA(S) NA PRAIA DO CASSINO-RIO GRANDE/RS-BRASIL

2014· article· pt· W1836680644 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Geografar · 2014
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRural Development and Agriculture
Canadian institutionsCanadian Journal of Administrative Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O artigo consiste no estudo de caso sobre festa popular de cunho religioso, em especial, a de homenagem a Iemanjá na Praia do Cassino, realizada entre os dias 1º e 2 de fevereiro. É uma das festas de cunho religioso afro-brasileira mais expressiva do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, com mais de 50 anos ininterruptos de realizações. O objetivo do estudo é contextualizar sobre as manifestações populares ocorridas na festa, e também as suas relações simbólicas. Assim, as festividades também ocorrem em expressões culturais religiosas desdobradas fora do espaço festivo estabelecido pelo Poder Público Municipal. E a religiosidade popular torna-se o saber que significa o apreender do Mito da “Senhora do Mar”, ou seja, o “homicídio” da divindade para jamais esquecê-la. Com isto, o subsídio social do estudo é de exercer uma leitura científica desprovida de preconceitos ao manusear a festa popular de cunho religioso no debate sobre o espaço simbólico como aporte para compreensão das manifestações sociais, através da religiosidade popular constituída dentro do espaço urbano rio-grandino.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.191
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it