Réformer les baisses de cotisations sociales ultramarines ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Afin de simuler les effets d’une réforme permettant, selon eux, d’optimiser la « dépense sociale », les auteurs utilisent une maquette chiffrée construite pour évaluer ex ante le dispositif « Girardin », un dispositif de réduction des cotisations sociales employeurs en vigueur dans les départements d’outre-mer français de 2003 à 2009. Ils recherchent un nouveau barème d’allègements, à coût budgétaire ex ante inchangé, qui permet de maximiser l’effet total sur l’emploi sans pénaliser les hausses de salaires. Leur proposition consiste à redéployer l’aide en direction du travail peu qualifié et des secteurs les plus exposés à la concurrence internationale. Cette proposition s’écarte assez sensiblement de la réforme qui s’est appliquée en 2009. Le chiffrage de ces effets conduit à une hausse de l’emploi de plus de 2 %.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".