Communication entre intervenants oeuvrant auprès de l’enfant d’âge préscolaire et les familles immigrantes : étude de la portée
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La communication entre les intervenants oeuvrant auprès des enfants d’âge préscolaire et les familles immigrantes ayant un enfant avec un trouble de développement pose des défis particuliers. Afin de favoriser le déploiement du plein potentiel de l’enfant, une compréhension mutuelle s’impose. Cette étude de la portée aborde les facilitateurs et les contraintes communicationnelles vécues dans un contexte interculturel et interlinguistique, ainsi que les outils, stratégies ou approches utilisés pour faciliter les échanges. Six bases de données ont été consultées et au terme d’une démarche de sélection interjuges, trente-cinq articles scientifiques ont été retenus. Les principaux obstacles et facilitateurs influençant la communication ont été dégagés. Toutefois, peu de stratégies concrètes, destinées aux intervenants et permettant de soutenir les échanges, ont pu être recensées.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".