MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1837015550 · doi:10.5376/ijms.2013.03.0034

Representation of Coastal Upwelling and Environmental Interactions in the Southern Benguela in Satellite Era Reanalysis

2013· article· en· W1837015550 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mark R. Jury

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Marine Science · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUpwellingSatelliteRepresentation (politics)ClimatologyOceanographyGeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ability of ocean and atmosphere reanalysis products to represent coastal upwelling in the southern Benguela (28°-36°S, 14°-20°E) is studied in the period 1980-2008. Mean maps, depth sections and seasonal cycle are analyzed for ocean color, sea surface temperature (SST), vertical velocity, winds and ocean currents in the zone. The paper first evaluates coastal winds and cross-shelf gradients of temperature in a variety of products; then provides an analysis of inter-relationships among variables averaged in the St Helena Bay sub-area. The 30km Coupled Forecast System reanalysis resolves the cool strip of SST with a 1℃~2℃ warm bias, while subsurface zonal overturning and a longshore current jet are featured in the 50km Simple Ocean Data Assimilation reanalysis. Mean coastal upwelling rates of 1-2 m/day are consistent with observations. The expected links are found between the annual cycle of meridional wind stress and longshore currents, and between uplift, temperature and salinity. A new finding is a connection between the zonal wind stress and chlorophyll anomalies (-35.86 mg m -3 /N m -2 ). When the subtropical anticyclone is located south-west of Africa, offshore winds prevail and phytoplankton blooms in the southern Benguela.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score0.490

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Marine ScienceSame topicOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesFrench-language works237,207