MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1837452076 · doi:10.7202/011241ar

Le golem de la biographie

2005· article· fr· W1837452076 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Jean Morency

Bibliographic record

VenueVoix et Images · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse Cultural and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Depuis son essai consacré à Victor Hugo en 1970, Victor-Lévy Beaulieu a multiplié les biographies d’écrivains. Ces essais entremêlant souvent l’écriture biographique et l’écriture de fiction, il devient possible de questionner la place qu’ils occupent dans l’oeuvre de Beaulieu et le rôle qu’ils jouent dans l’élaboration de ses textes de fiction. Dans cet article, l’auteur analyse les rapports entre l’écriture biographique et l’écriture de fiction chez Beaulieu, principalement dans Monsieur Melville . Dans un premier temps, il dégage la dialectique de la biographie et de la fiction chez Beaulieu, notamment à la lumière de l’inscription de la figure du golem dans Monsieur Melville . Dans un deuxième temps, à partir des thèmes de la filiation et de l’héritage, l’auteur mesure l’impact de Monsieur Melville sur l’élaboration de l’oeuvre littéraire de Beaulieu dans les années quatre-vingt et quatre-vingt-dix.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.717
Threshold uncertainty score0.987

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVoix et ImagesSame topicDiverse Cultural and Historical StudiesFrench-language works237,207