MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W183747266

Architectural design and analysis of an N-tier enterprise application

2007· article· en· W183747266 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternet, Multimedia Systems and Applications · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Software Engineering Methodologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSoftware engineeringAgile software developmentSchematicSoftware developmentExtensibilityScalabilitySystems development life cycleArchitecture tradeoff analysis methodSystems engineeringReference architectureSoftwareSoftware development processSoftware constructionSoftware architectureDatabaseEngineeringOperating system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Software development follows a complex life cycle. For most small to medium sized applications, agile development yields better results because of the iterative nature of this approach. We describe the software architecture and analysis of an N-Tier Application System through design patterns, specifications, diagrams, and schematics. Our work is based on an extensive research on the state-of-the-art technologies which was subsequently applied to produce a commercially deployed software application. The resulting application boasts robustness, flexibility, scalability, extensibility, reliability and security. The proposed methodology can be applied to both new applications and to existing software that needs to be upgraded to take advantage of the new technologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.930
Threshold uncertainty score0.426

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it