Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le roman montréalais actuel configure souvent un espace géographique beaucoup plus vaste que la ville elle-même, celle-ci se situant au croisement de trajectoires qui étendent ses frontières imaginaires aux dimensions du monde. Pensons à Nikolski de Nicolas Dickner, par exemple, ou au dernier roman de Monique LaRue, L’Œil de Marquise. Mais, tout aussi bien, certains écrivains choisissent, dans un mouvement inverse, de condenser l’espace urbain, saisissant Montréal à travers l’un de ses quartiers. Je me pencherai sur deux oeuvres fort différentes, le roman 20h17 rue Darling de Bernard Émond, et le recueil de poèmes L’Œil au calendrier de Gabriel Landry, afin de comprendre comment l’urbanité montréalaise s’y vit dans les limites d’un quartier, Hochelaga, qui devient ainsi l’incarnation intime de la ville. Je m’intéresserai à la forme qui se trouve donnée au temps, dans cet espace métonymique, et à la manière dont le temps et l’espace se trouvent croisés au fil des déambulations des sujets narrateurs qui font d’Hochelaga le lieu improbable du vivre-ensemble montréalais le plus contemporain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.031 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".