Bibliographic record
Abstract
Depuis une trentaine d'annees, la revendication souverainiste quebecoise, une revendication nationaliste, a souvent defraye la chronique. On a beaucoup parle, entre 1963 et 1970, des actions terroristes du Front de liberation du Quebec qui, a l'epoque, ont provoque quelques morts, dont celle d'un ministre du gouvernement provincial en octobre 1970. On a aussi beaucoup parle de l'appui donne au mouvement souverainiste par le president de la Republique francaise, le general de Gaulle, le 24 juillet 1967 («Vive le Quebec libre ! »). On a, egalement, fait grand cas de la victoire du parti des souverainistes, le Parti quebecois, aux elections legislatives provinciales du 15 novembre 1976, de son echec lors d'un premier referendum relatif au projet de faire du Quebec un pays souverain, le 20 mai 1980, et de son deuxieme echec, lors d'un nouveau referendum, le 30 octobre 1995. On a meme fait etat, dans les bulletins de nouvelles en Europe, aux Etats-Unis et dans quelques pays de la Francophonie et du Commonwealth, des reactions exprimees par des adversaires des souverainistes quand le Bloc quebecois, un parti souverainiste, est devenu, a la suite des «elections federales» du 25 octobre 1993, l'opposition officielle, a titre de deuxieme plus important parti represente a la Chambre des communes d'Ottawa, avec 55 sieges sur 295. En bref, pour quantite de gens, au Canada et ailleurs, l'histoire recente du Quebec, c'est l'histoire de la «longue marche» des souverainistes quebecois. Meme
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".