MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1838146780 · doi:10.3917/difa.034.0147

L’après-coup, le trauma sexuel et le couple

2015· article· fr· W1838146780 on OpenAlexaff
Serge Arpin

Bibliographic record

VenueLe Divan familial · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Canadian institutionsHôpital Charles-Le Moyne
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’auteur introduit la notion d’après-coup appliquée à la psychanalyse de couple. Il étudie la manifestation de l’après-coup dans le contexte où un des conjoints a subi des traumas sexuels violents, par le passé, avant la constitution du couple. Un événement fortuit de la vie quotidienne provoque l’après-coup, faisant ré-émerger le trauma, du dedans. Dans le premier temps, les scènes d’agression resurgissent dans le registre du masochisme érogène, dans le désir masochiste d’être agressé. Ce premier temps sera suivi d’un deuxième effet d’après-coup où la violence sera explosive, se situant alors dans le registre sadique. Les fantasmes issus de ces mouvements deviendront les fantasmes organisateurs de la vie sexuelle du couple et infléchiront lourdement leur relation de couple.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.426
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.115
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLe Divan familialSame topicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchFrench-language works237,207