Reliability centered maintenance implementation in Hydro-Quebec transmission system
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In today's competitive market, utilities want to optimize their maintenance efforts in order to maximize equipment reliability and availability at lowest cost. Thus, utilities want to know as much as possible the real condition of equipment by the use of an optimal SPM (systematic preventive maintenance) program. An SPM program usually defines "what to do" and "when to do" SPM actions. The "what" and the "when" are of course closely related because for any inappropriate task selection, there won't be any appropriate task interval that will prevent failure. Inversely, appropriate actions performed at an inappropriate interval will lead to a nonoptimized SPM program (too expensive or poor apparatus reliability). The RCM method is very effective to select "what to do" in a SPM program. Optimal task interval ("when to do") is rather defined by the use of historical data and experience or, for some utilities, by economical evaluation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it