Study on Chinese Medicine Shouwu Capsules on Immune Function in Athletes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To observe the effect of Chinese medicine health care products Shouwu capsules on immune function in athletes during training, and to explore its possible mechanism. Methods: the test group received can strengthen the immune function of Chinese medicine health Shouwu capsules, the control group did not take. CD4+CD8+ CD4+, CD8+, T lymphocyte subsets ( + ) and CD4+/CD8+ ratio, serum immunoglobulin ( Ig ) IgA, IgG, IgM were observed before and after the experimental period, 30 days of observation, changes of immune function in athletes. Results : after the experiment, the test group CD4+ significantly increased the proportion of IgG ratio, numerical experiment, compared with before the experiment with statistical difference, P ≤ 0.05, CD4+CD8+ group ( + ) ratio decreased significantly, P ≤ 0.05. Conclusion: take Shouwu capsules can improve athletes the percentage of CD4 positive cells, can enhance the immune function of T lymphocytes, immune response in the balance of IgG, can regulate humoral immune function. Can effectively improve the athletes sleep, appetite, physical strength, improve the athlete ‘s body function, more conducive to the improvement of sports performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".