MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cloning, Expression, and Functional Analysis of Patient-Derived Hepatitis C Virus Glycoproteins

2007· review· en· W183831945 on OpenAlexaff
Alexander W. Tarr, Ania M. Owsianka, Alexandra Szwejk, Jonathan K. Ball, Arvind H. Patel

Bibliographic record

VenueMethods in molecular biology · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis C virus research
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
Fundersnot available
KeywordsViral quasispeciesVirologyGlycoproteinHepatitis C virusVirusBiologyInfectivityGenotypeViral envelopeHepatocellular carcinomaLiver diseaseGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major cause of severe chronic liver disease including cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. HCV has been classified into six major genotypes that exhibit extensive genetic variability, particularly in the envelope glycoproteins E1 and E2. Knowledge of genotypic and quasispecies variation on viral glycoprotein properties is important in understanding the structure-function relationship of the proteins. Through their perceived role as components of the virion and mediators of virus attachment and entry, HCV glycoproteins are primary targets for the development of antiviral agents. In this chapter, we describe methods optimized to extract E1E2-encoding sequences of all the major genotypes from HCV-infected patient sera, and their amplification, cloning, expression, and biochemical characterization. Furthermore, we describe a method to generate retroviral nucleocapsid pseudotyped with HCV E1E2 of diverse genotypes (HCVpp) whereby infectivity of the retroviral particle is conferred by HCV glycoproteins. Finally, we show how the HCVpp can be used in an infection assay to determine the viral glycoprotein function at the level of the host-pathogen interface and subsequent events leading to virus infection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.488
Teacher spread0.399 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMethods in molecular biologySame topicHepatitis C virus researchFrench-language works237,207