Inicijative za promicanje pristupačnosti elektroničkih informacija osobama s invaliditetom
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents an overview of the developments that led to the establishment of standards for management and\ndefinition of technological, economic and social aspects of accessibility of Internet sites and electronic documents for persons with disabilities. The persons with disabilities are being discriminated due to a lack of accessibility of electronic information.\nAccessibility of electronic resources is not limited to disability related issues only but it also takes into account situational, social and cultural aspects . Indeed, those aspects do not exclude functionality as an important criterion. They include cultural, social,gender and situational aspects as the use of Internet should not be based solely on a person’s disability. Other aspects of personality should not be neglected either. The development of free software has enabled easier implementation and the development of web applications developed according to the accessibility guidelines. Free software ATutor is presented in this paper as a successful and viable application for accessible learning content management. Free licensing enables everybody to use this software freely.\nLegal regulations enacted in EU, USA, Canada, Australia and other states give an example of how this issue can be legally regulated in a successful way. A variety of civic, governmental, inter-governmental associations and institutions strive on local and international levels to promote and implement standards and legal regulations in the field.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it