MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1838998620

Métodos para determinar la conductividad hidráulica saturada y no saturada de los suelos

2011· article· es· W1838998620 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
D. Gabriëls, L Deyanira Lobo, M Mansonia Pulido

Bibliographic record

VenueVenesuelos · 2011
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil and Unsaturated Flow
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPermeameterHydraulic conductivityGeomorphologyPhysicsHumanitiesHydrology (agriculture)GeologySoil waterGeotechnical engineeringSoil scienceArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La conductividad hidraulica saturada es una propiedad clave en la descripcion de los procesos de infiltracion y redistribucion de agua en el suelo. Esta puede ser determinada en el laboratorio y en el campo. En el laboratorio la determinacion de la conductividad hidraulica se realiza en muestras cilindricas no disturbadas, mediante el uso de un permeametro de carga constante o con un permeametro de carga variable. Debido a las limitaciones para obtener muestras no disturbadas representativas, ademas del relativo pequeno tamano de las mismas, asi como la variabilidad de las mediciones, es preferible realizar mediciones de campo. En el campo, hay dos condiciones para realizar las mediciones: por debajo del nivel freatico (condiciones saturadas), y condiciones no saturadas. En el presente trabajo se describen los metodos y equipos mas comunmente usados para determinar esta propiedad del suelo Los metodos descritos incluyen: el metodo del pozo, el piezometro, el infiltrometro de doble anillo, el metodo del pozo invertido, el permeametro de Guelph, el infiltrometro de tension y el infiltrometro de disco.  Palabras clave: permeabilidad, flujo saturado, flujo no saturado, permeametro, infiltrometro Abstract The saturated hydraulic conductivity is a key soil property that controls the infiltration and redistribution processes of water in the soil. It can be determined either at the laboratory or on field conditions. At the laboratory the hydraulic conductivity can be determined on undisturbed core samples, using a constant head permeameter or with a falling head permeameter.  However, it is preferable to carry out field measurements due to the difficulties to obtain representative undisturbed samples, the relative small size of the core samples, and the variability of the laboratory determinations, On the field, the measurements can be carried out either below the groundwater table (saturated conditions), or above the groundwater level (unsaturated conditions). The most common methods and equipments used for measuring the soil hydraulic conductivity are described in this work, including: the constant head permeameter, the falling head permeameter, the auger-hole method, the piezometer method, the double ring infiltrometer method, the Guelph permeameter, the tension infiltrometer, and the disc infiltrometer.  Key words: permeability, saturated flow, unsaturated flow, permeameter, infiltrometer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVenesuelosSame topicSoil and Unsaturated FlowFrench-language works237,207