MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1839228204 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.141318

Orbital Myositis and Primary Sjögren Syndrome

2015· letter· en· W1839228204 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
François‐Xavier Danlos, F. Daoued, Raphaèle Séror, Xavier Mariette

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2015
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIgG4-Related and Inflammatory Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAnti-nuclear antibodySystemic diseaseDermatologyDiplopiaSarcoidosisPtosisSicca syndromePathologySurgeryImmunopathologyImmunologyAntibodyDiseaseAutoantibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To the Editor: In this report, we describe a new systemic manifestation associated with primary Sjögren syndrome (pSS): orbital myositis (OM). Considered a systemic disorder, pSS is primarily characterized by lymphocytic infiltration of exocrine glands, resulting in functional impairment of salivary and lacrymal glands. The inflammatory process, however, extends beyond the exocrine glands and can potentially affect any organ. A 40-year-old white man with pSS was admitted with diplopia. Since 2002, his disease manifested with sicca syndrome, polyarthralgia, antinuclear antibodies, and anti-SSA and -SSB antibodies, and lymphocytic sialadenitis (focus score of 1) associated with Hashimoto thyroiditis. He previously developed 2 neurological complications: aseptic meningoradiculitis following treatment with infliximab in 2002 (in the Trial of Remicade in Primary Sjögren’s Syndrome randomized clinical trial)1, and bilateral idiopathic sudden … Address correspondence to Dr. X. Mariette, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Sud, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Bicêtre, Service de Rhumatologie, 78 rue du Général Leclerc, Le Kremlin Bicêtre 94275, France. E-mail: xavier.mariette{at}bct.aphp.fr

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.654
Threshold uncertainty score0.933

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of RheumatologySame topicIgG4-Related and Inflammatory DiseasesFrench-language works237,207