The Mute in the Shadow in the Distance: Towards a New “Oriental Femininism”
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ruan Lingyu as a film illustrating “women as women” as real women denies radical Feminism of film studies to remarkable degree: there’s no sexual appeal, thus no “male gaze” in sense of humiliating females; there is persecution of patriarchism, yet what finally leaves her no choice other than death is that the three men she loves would not give her real love in return. Though the woman is in “center stage” position, as if “the whole sky”, she’s especially unhappy. And, how striking her beauty, silence, endurance, her will are, even and especially in the distance in the shadow. Here the “Oriental” Femininism is in fact for the mute among all the women in this world, for those who never pronounce anger and resistance, because their happiness lies not simply in “equality”, “liberation”, but in “love”, no matter in the “first” or “second” or “third” world they are. Key words: Oriental Femininism; Subject; Object; Aesthetics of femininityResume: Ruan Lingyu est un film qui illustre femmes en tant que femmes». Les vraies femmes denient le feminisme radical. Il n'y a pas d'appel sexuel, donc pas de regard masculin dans le sens de l'humiliation des femmes; il y a une persecution du patriarcat, mais ce qui l'a finalement privee des choix de vivre sont les trois hommes qu'elle aime, et qui ne lui donnerait pas leur veritable amour en retour. Bien que femme est dans position de la scene centrale , elle est particulierement malheureuse. Et malgre sa beaute fulgurante, son silence, son endurance et sa volonte sont, meme et surtout au loin dans l'ombre. Ici le femininisme oriental est pour muette parmi toutes les femmes dans le monde, pour celles qui ne prononcent jamais leur colere et resistance, parce que leur bonheur ne reside pas simplement dans l'egalite, dans liberation, mais dans l'amour, peu importe qu'elles sont dans le premier, deuxieme ou tiers monde.Mots-cles: femininisme oriental; sujet; objet; esthetique de feminite
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".