MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1839663547 · doi:10.5376/ijh.2015.05.0012

Genetic Diversity and Relationship in Squash Using Morphological, Chemical and Molecular Analyses

2015· article· en· W1839663547 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Horticulture · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvances in Cucurbitaceae Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSquashGenetic diversityDiversity (politics)BiologyEvolutionary biologyBotanySociologyDemographyAnthropologyPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Germplasm characterization is an important link between the conservation and utilization of plant genetic resources. A collection of thirteen summer, spaghetti and acorn squash ( Cucurbita pepo L .) and one winter squash ( Cucurbita moschata L .) germplasm accessions were screened using morphological (leaf area, fruit weight, fruit length, fruit firmness), chemical [Soluble Solids Content (S.S.C.), ascorbic acid] and molecular [Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD)] analyses. A wide range of variability among genotypes was recorded for morphological and chemical characteristics. The percentages of variation were 217%, 532%, 175%, 166%, 148%, 520% for leaf area, fruit length, fruit weight, fruit firmness, S.S.C, ascorbic acid content, respectively. Both significant positive and negative correlations have been found between the morphological and chemical characteristics. The RAPD analysis produced 209 DNA fragments with 100% polymorphism in two or more squash genotypes while none of the fragments showed monomorphic behavior among squash genotypes. At a similarity level of 82% the genotypes were divided into two clusters. The first cluster consisted of eight genotypes (PI 506466- PI 292014- PI 518688- PI 615119- PI 136448- Butternut- Copi- Eskandrani). The second cluster contained only two genotypes (Yellow Crookneck and Shamamy). When the cluster analysis of RAPD patterns was associated with morphological and chemical evaluation of squash genotypes used in this study, there was a notable degree of agreement. The RAPD-PCR was found to be suitable for use with squash due to its ability to discriminate between genotypes and determine their genetic relationship. Results obtained in this investigation provide clear evidence that there is a considerable variation among summer squash genotypes. Present results support the development of breeding programs in squash since high genetic variability in its accessions and landraces has been found.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.215
Threshold uncertainty score0.208

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it