MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1839688496

Accurate modeling of the structure of the acoustic field radiated by a submerged cylindrical shell responding to an external pulse

2012· article· en· W1839688496 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
С. С. Яковлев, H.A.F.A. Santos, Kyle Williston, Robynne E. Murray, M. Mitchell

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian acoustics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaKillam TrustsDalhousie University
KeywordsShell (structure)RADIUSBoundary value problemMechanicsPulse (music)Spherical shellAcousticsField (mathematics)Sound pressureStress (linguistics)Fluid–structure interactionMaterials sciencePhysicsFinite element methodStructural engineeringEngineeringOpticsComposite materialMathematicsComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate modeling of the structure of the acoustic field radiated by a submerged cylinderical shell responding to an external pulse is presented. A thin evacuated elastic circular cylindrical shell submerged into fluid is considered and it is modeled using the Reissner-Mindlin theory of shells. A steel shell is considered with the thickness of 0.03 m and the radius of 1 m, submerged into water. The fluids and the shell are coupled through the dynamic boundary condition on the interface. The results show that simulations of the stress state of the shell based on RM model take only 13% longer than those based on the KL model. Simulated time-histories of the acoustic pressure were evaluated at several points of the fluid to the available experimental time-histories for similar systems, and a very good match for the the waves is observed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.141
Threshold uncertainty score0.966

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian acousticsSame topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207