MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1839876751 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1510.08345

A polynomial expansion line search for large-scale unconstrained minimization of smooth L2-regularized loss functions, with implementation in Apache Spark

2015· preprint· en· W1839876751 on OpenAlexaff
Michael B Hynes, Hans De Sterck

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2015
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Optimization Algorithms Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLine searchConjugate gradient methodBroyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shanno algorithmComputer scienceGradient descentAlgorithmPolynomialMathematical optimizationTaylor seriesLine (geometry)Function (biology)MathematicsArtificial intelligenceArtificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In large-scale unconstrained optimization algorithms such as limited memory BFGS (LBFGS), a common subproblem is a line search minimizing the loss function along a descent direction. Commonly used line searches iteratively find an approximate solution for which the Wolfe conditions are satisfied, typically requiring multiple function and gradient evaluations per line search, which is expensive in parallel due to communication requirements. In this paper we propose a new line search approach for cases where the loss function is analytic, as in least squares regression, logistic regression, or low rank matrix factorization. We approximate the loss function by a truncated Taylor polynomial, whose coefficients may be computed efficiently in parallel with less communication than evaluating the gradient, after which this polynomial may be minimized with high accuracy in a neighbourhood of the expansion point. Our Polynomial Expansion Line Search (PELS) was implemented in the Apache Spark framework and used to accelerate the training of a logistic regression model on binary classification datasets from the LIBSVM repository with LBFGS and the Nonlinear Conjugate Gradient (NCG) method. In large-scale numerical experiments in parallel on a 16-node cluster with 256 cores using the URL, KDDA, and KDDB datasets, the PELS approach produced significant convergence improvements compared to the use of classical Wolfe line searches. For example, to reach the final training label prediction accuracies, LBFGS using PELS had speedup factors of 1.8--2 over LBFGS using a Wolfe line search, measured by both the number of iterations and the time required, due to the better accuracy of step sizes computed in the line search. PELS has the potential to significantly accelerate large-scale regression and factorization computations, and is applicable to continuous optimization problems with smooth loss functions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicAdvanced Optimization Algorithms ResearchFrench-language works237,207