MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1839959357 · doi:10.1112/blms/bdv080

A Gleason-Kahane-Żelazko theorem for modules and applications to holomorphic function spaces

2015· preprint· en· W1839959357 on OpenAlexaff
Javad Mashreghi, Thomas Ransford

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of the London Mathematical Society · 2015
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicHolomorphic and Operator Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsHardy spaceHolomorphic functionPure mathematicsBergman spaceEndomorphismOpen mapping theorem (functional analysis)Space (punctuation)Function spaceFunction (biology)Zero (linguistics)Interpolation spaceFunctional analysisMathematical analysisBanach spaceEberlein–Šmulian theoremLp spaceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We generalize the Gleason–Kahane–Żelazko theorem to modules. As an application, we show that every linear functional on a Hardy space that is non-zero on the outer functions is a multiple of a point evaluation. A further consequence is that every linear endomorphism of a Hardy space that maps outer functions to nowhere-zero functions is a weighted composition operator. In neither case is continuity assumed. We also consider some extensions to other function spaces, including the Bergman, Dirichlet and Besov spaces, the little Bloch space and VMOA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.230
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of the London Mathematical SocietySame topicHolomorphic and Operator TheoryFrench-language works237,207