Quaternary Stratigraphy in Northwestern Maine: A Progress Report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A preliminary Quaternary stratigraphy for northwestern Maine can be assembled from interpretation of ice-flow indicators (dispersal and erosional), exposed sections, and drill-hole logs. Evidence from the ice-flow indicators delineates at least four regions each with different ice-flow histories. The distribution of these regions may result from an eastward invasion of Laurentide source ice during the early portion of the late Wisconsinan and subsequent development of a local ice dome during the closing portion of the Late Wisconsinan substage. Exposed sections contribute the following probable sequence of events to the stratigraphy: 1) deposition of alluvial fans, 2) deposition of a gray compact till beneath eastward flowing (Laurentide) ice, 3) deposition of a brown till beneath northward flowing local ice, 4) deglaciation by a southward retreating ice margin. These events appear continuous and have all been provisionally assigned a Late Wisconsinan age. Drill-hole logs confirm the sequence derived from the exposed sections and allow extension of the Quaternary stratigraphy. The drill-log data show three associated groups of sediments that may in turn result from at least three separate ice margin advances and recessions. The uppermost group of sediments is correlated with those found in exposed sections. The position of the drill-hole logs in an over-deepened basin suggest erosion by at least one even earlier glaciation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".