MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1840441999 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2014-0696

Theoretical calculation of the electronic states below 326 000 cm<sup>−1</sup> of the NaHe molecule

2015· article· en· W1840441999 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
S. Kontar, Mahmoud Korek

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsMultireference configuration interactionAtomic physicsAsymptotePotential energyDipoleDissociation (chemistry)Perturbation theory (quantum mechanics)Ground stateDiatomic moleculeMoleculeQuantum mechanicsExcited stateConfiguration interactionPhysical chemistryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The potential energy curves have been investigated for the lowest 54 electronic states in the [Formula: see text] representation of the molecule NaHe via the multireference configuration interaction method (MRCI) and second-order multireference perturbation theory (RPST2-RS2). The harmonic vibrational frequency, ω e , the internuclear distance, R e, the electronic energy with respect to the ground state, T e , and the permanent dipole moment, μ, have been calculated. The positions of R min and R max and their minimum and maximum energies E min and E max with respect to the dissociation asymptote have been determined for the considered electronic states. The comparison of our investigated values to the theoretical and experimental data available in the literature shows a good agreement. Forty-three electronic states have been studied theoretically in the present work for the first time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.136
Threshold uncertainty score0.434

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamicsFrench-language works237,207