Médiateurs et médiations sociales constitutives de l’épistémè de la connaissance économique au Québec dans la première moitié du xxe siècle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article traite de l’épistémè de la connaissance économique au Québec à partir des médiateurs et des médiations sociales qui la construisent. L’approche adoptée est celle d’une sociologie de la connaissance à partir du cadre d’analyse des contradictions « fondamentales et flagrantes » proposé par H. Arendt caractérisant la transition à la modernité. À partir de cette approche est reconstruite la localisation sociale des premiers penseurs de l’économie, É. Montpetit et E. Minville, située à travers le savoir religieux issu de leur socialisation et le cadre de pensée de l’universalisme économique acquis de par leur éducation. Il est montré que ces activités de connaissance mettent en jeu un travail lié à des publications mais aussi des dispositifs, des réseaux, des revues, travail dont l’analyse permet de comprendre la genèse hétérodoxe de la pensée économique au Québec dans son lieu principal, les HEC de Montréal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.031 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".