MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

“Slasher” in China: From the Perspective of Sociology

2010· article· en· W1840558144 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zhigang Mei

Bibliographic record

VenueCross-cultural communication · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender, Feminism, and Media
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMainstreamChinaPeriod (music)Subculture (biology)Gender studiesSociologyPerspective (graphical)ConsciousnessSocial changePsychologyAestheticsArtHistoryPolitical scienceVisual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

“Slasher” is a special social group appearing recent years. Slashers in our country depending on International web, develops very quickly and has a large number of members. The development of Chinese slashers experiences four periods: Breeding period, Seeding period, Chaoyang period and High-speed development period. This paper takes a research on the Chinese slashers according to the angle of social subculture, social psychology and Cultural Anthropology. And this paper also analyzes the reason of the group of the slashers’ formation from the aspects of social macroscopic and microcosmic: History factors, Social soil, Sex factors and Cultural media development as well as Young female psychological factors. As an emerging group, the slashers indicate many special characters: low-aged, focused on big cities, the lack of understanding of the reality of homosexuality, and extended from slasher cultural. And the social influences of the slashers cannot be neglected. The development of the slashers enhances the contemporary female feminist consciousness and the female awareness. The appearance of the slashers eases the social treatment with heterosexuality to some extent. The analyses of Chinese slashers are offered to help with a better perspective of understanding of slashers culture to deal with the relationship between the social mainstream culture and slasher subculture, and promote the healthy physical and mental development of young people. Key Words: Slasher; Slasher subculture; Female adolescent; psychology Resume: Le cercle de jeunes femmes fan de Doujinshi est un groupe social assez special apparu en Chine depuis quelques annees. Il se developpe d’une vitesse surprenante en s’appuyant sur le reseau d’Internet et attire un grand nombre de partiquantes. Le developpement du cercle de jeunes femmes fan de Doujinshi en Chine a connu quatre periodes : la periode de conception, la periode de bourgeonnement, la periode de commencement et la periode de developpement rapide. Cet article etude le groupe de jeunes femmes fan de Doujinshi du point de vue de la sous-culture sociale, de la psychologie sociale et de l’anthropologie culturelle. L’auteur attaque le sujet depuis a la fois la perspective macro-sociale et micro-sociale. Selon lui, il existe plusieurs causes pour l’apparition du cercle de jeunes femmes fan de Doujinshi : des raisons historiques,l’environnement social, des facteurs lies a la sexualite, la culture et des medias et les facteurs psychologiques des jeunes femmes. En tant qu’un nouveau groupe social marginalise, le cercle de jeunes femmes fan de Doujinshi represente quelques caracteristiques : il atteint surtout des filles de jeune âge dans les grandes villes, qui connaissent peu la realite de l’homosexualite et c’est derive de la culture Tanbi. Les impacts sociaux de ce cercel sont inegligeables. Son apparition incarne l'emergence de la montee de la conscience feministe et ameliore dans une certaine mesure l’attitude de la societe vis a vis des homosexualite. Cet article tente de rendre les gens en savoir plus sur le cercle de jeunes femmes fan de Doujinshi et la culture de Doujinshi afin de mieux traiter les relations entre la culture de courant principal et la sous-culture de Doujinshi, et promouvoir le developpement de la sante physique et psychologique des adolescents. Mots-cles: jeunes femmes fan de Doujinshi; sous-culture de jeunes femmes fan de Doujinshi; psychologique des adolescentes 摘 要:“同人女”是近年來在中國形成的一個極爲特殊的社會群體。中國的同人女以網絡爲依託,發展速度十分 迅速,數量可觀。中國同人女發展經歷了孕育期、萌芽期、朝陽期、高速發展期四個階段。本文從社會亞文化、 社會心理、文化人類學的角度對同人女群體進行觀察研究,從社會宏觀與微觀兩個方面入手,認爲中國同人女的 形成具有其特定的歷史淵源、社會土壤、性因素、文化傳媒以及年輕女性心理因素。“同人女”作爲一個新興的邊 緣群體體現出年齡低齡化、集中於大城市、對現實同性戀缺乏瞭解、由耽美文化延伸而來等特徵。同人女群體所 帶來的社會影響同樣不容忽視,它的出現與興起體現出當代女性女權意識的高度增強,女性覺悟的極度提高,同 人女群體的出現在一定程度上緩和了社會對待同戀性的態度。本文通過對中國同人女群體的研究分析,旨在使人 們更加瞭解同人女群體,瞭解同人女文化,從而處理好社會主流文化與同人女亞文化的關係,促進青少年的身心 健康發展。 關 鍵 詞:同人女; 同人女亞文化; 女性青少年心理

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score0.180

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.006
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCross-cultural communicationSame topicGender, Feminism, and MediaFrench-language works237,207