MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1840648038 · doi:10.1109/iwsoc.2004.7

A field programmable bit-serial digital signal processor

2004· article· en· W1840648038 on OpenAlexaff
Syed Abdul Rahim, L.E. Turner

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE International Workshop on System-on-Chip for Real-Time Applications · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Filter Design and Implementation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDigital signal processingComputer hardwareArithmetic logic unitMultiplication (music)Digital signal processorSignal processingSerial communicationDigital filterDigital signalField-programmable gate arrayFilter (signal processing)ArithmeticMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The field programmable digital signal processor (FPDSP) architecture is intended to allow application specific DSP filtering at moderate sample rates where the ability to rapidly modify the filter characteristics can be used to an advantage. Applications that the FPDSP will be best suited for are rapid prototyping of filters, audio applications, and to evaluate the potential advantages of run-time reconfiguration. The system architecture is based on an input pipelined least significant bit first bit-serial two's complement arithmetic. It performs digital signal processing by using programmable bit-serial signal processing units and programmable interconnect. The bit-serial processing units implement simple arithmetic operations: summation, multiplication and division by powers of two, and multiplication by negative one. The programmable unit also has variable bit-delays to time-align bit-serial words and also generates the control signals for the arithmetic operations internally. By combining the functions of these programmable units, a 2nd order recursive filter has been built and tested to verify the functionality of the FPDSP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE International Workshop on System-on-Chip for Real-Time ApplicationsSame topicDigital Filter Design and ImplementationFrench-language works237,207