MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1840671024 · doi:10.5589/m12-031

Effects of incidence angles on mapping accuracy of surficial materials in the Umiujalik Lake area, Nunavut, using RADARSAT-2 polarimetric SAR images. Part 2. Polarimetric analysis

2012· article· en· W1840671024 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Yask Shelat, Brigitte Leblon, Armand LaRocque, Jeff Harris, C W Jefferson, David R. Lentz, V Tschirhart

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Remote Sensing · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWishart distributionPolarimetryRemote sensingGeographySynthetic aperture radarDigital elevation modelCartographyComputer scienceScatteringMachine learningMultivariate statisticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Our study assesses the effect of incidence angle on classifications obtained using various polarimetric classifiers applied to polarimetric RADARSAT-2 synthetic aperature radar (SAR) images for mapping surficial materials in Arctic Canada. The RADARSAT-2 polarimetric SAR images were acquired over the Umiujalik Lake test area of Nunavut in three west-looking descending beam modes (FQ1, FQ12, and FQ20) with increasing respective incidence angles. Polarimetric analyses included computation of polarimetric signatures, Wishart supervised classification, as well as Wishart–H/, Wishart–H//A, and Freeman–Wishart unsupervised classifications. Polarimetric signatures helped to understand class separability as a function of the scattering mechanisms of the surficial materials considered in this study. The medium incidence angle (FQ12) image produced the best overall classification accuracy (48.7%) for the Wishart supervised classification. In general, the Freeman–Wishart unsupervised classification produced better areal distribution of surficial materials with the FQ12 and FQ20 images than with the steep angle FQ1 image. More sophisticated classification algorithms are required to combine the multibeam RADARSAT-2 polarimetric SAR images with other geospatial data such as optical images and digital elevation model data. The influences of variable environmental conditions (moisture and temperature) on mapping accuracy of surficial materials also require further research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.906
Threshold uncertainty score0.983

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2012
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Remote SensingSame topicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and TechniquesFrench-language works237,207