First Arrival Time Auto-Picking Method Based on Multi-Time Windows Energy Ratio
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
First arrival time auto-picking technique plays an important role in seismic exploration. It is widely used in shallow layer tomography and static correction. Conventional method that based on sliding time windows energy ratio is not stable. Here a new method based on multi-time windows energy ratio is proposed. Combining with automatic quality control and phase-domain first arrival estimation technique, our method performs perfectly on seismic records of normal S/N ratio. In the computational process of conventional sliding time windows energy ratio method, first arrivals are often determined by the maximum energy ratio of two adjacent sliding time windows. It is well known that for low S/N ratio data the conventional picking is not effective, and for high S/N ratio data weak reflections are hardly detected. The reason is that first arrival time does not correspond to the maximum energy ratio. Meanwhile conventional method sometime picks local secondary extreme of energy ratio. The new method of multi-time windows energy ratio method takes both maximum and local secondary extreme in consideration. Hence new method promotes the stability and accuracy of first arrival picking. Combined with automatic quality control and phase-domain first arrival estimation, the new method performs well in its application in the middle part of Dzungarian Basin(Northwest China).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it