Review of Waste Tire Reuse& Recycling in China —current situation, problems and countermeasures
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article first expounds the current situation on waste tire generation and recycling in China. Then i t analyses the existing problems and causes in the industry of waste tire recycling. Finally, it proposes countermeasures and suggestion on promoting a healthy waste tire industry. These strategies include accelerating the speed of drawing up regulations on waste tire reuse and recycling management, completing encourage policies and mechanism of waste tire resource recycling industry, developing adequately the influence of China Rubber Industry Association (CRIA) and China Tire Retreading And Utilization Association (CTRA), and etc.. China has an abundant resource of waste tires and recycling potential. And it will be of great significance to mitigating the scarcity of rubber resource, improving ecological environment, developing circular economy and building resource-efficient society in China if we can reuse and recycle waste tires properly and form a healthy waste tire industry. Key words : waste tires ; circular economy ; ecological environment ; reuse & recycling
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it