Bibliographic record
Abstract
The little that is known about Irving’s Canadian series of five cent music is encompassed in an article by Dr. Helmut Kallmann included in The Encyclopedia of music in Canada (Kallmann 1992a, 637). This Series of 750 sheet music issues was published in Toronto and Clifton (Niagara Falls) by the Toronto News Company and in Montreal by the Montreal News Company. The popular songs of the day were issued without copyright notice or an indication of * © 2009 The author and the Canadian Association of Music Libraries, Archives, and Documentation Centres/L’auteur et l’Association canadienne des bibliothèques, archives et centres de documentation musicaux. 13 the year of publication; it was thought, however, that most were published in the 1880s and a majority of those issues which have been catalogued and whose bibliographic records appear in the Amicus database, indicate the probable years of publication as 1880 to 1885 (Amicus catalogue). However, bibliographic records for issues held by Library and Archives Canada guess that number three in the Series was published between 1867 and 1873, and number six between 1871 and 1874. Those bibliographic records also indicate that 1885 is the probable date
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.071 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".