Bibliographic record
Abstract
The accreditation requirement is that allengineering students be introduced to their professionalresponsibilities, and particularly, those relating to“social, health, safety and legal” aspects. There is nodefinition as to what this entails, and there areconsiderable differences between schools in deliveredcontent.Ontario has made two substantial changes to Health andSafety legislation and regulation. Workers, supervisorsand employers have always been covered by thelegislation; the legislative changes mean that students arenow covered under Occupational Health and Safetylegislation. This change brings all undergraduateteaching facilities into compliance with the IndustrialRegulations. The impact on research will be profound asall research laboratories will workplaces, under theIndustrial Regulations, and supervisors will have"supervisory'' obligations for their students.Ontario now requires that all workers have introductorytraining on the health and safety system as well astraining on workplace specific hazards. All supervisorsare required to complete training on their responsibilities,including hazard recognition. This training is availableas e-modules, and this minimum training is acceptable forall workplaces, and workplaces are allowed to use theirown materials so long as they cover a defined list oftopics. The supervisory level material defines a minimumstandard of content for all engineers, which is readilysupplemented by additional content, such as working atheights, WHMIS, and electrical safety.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.177 | 0.097 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".