MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1841190173

"ZOMBIES AND COWYBOYS: HOW TO WIN THE APOCALYPSE"

2014· article· en· W1841190173 on OpenAlexaff
Mark Cronlund Anderson

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Scientific Journal ESJ · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGothic Literature and Media Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZombieHollywoodPopular cultureApocalypticismNarrativePopularityTrope (literature)HistoryLiteratureParanormalArtArt historyLawPolitical scienceComputer securityComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

―Zombies and Cowyboys: How to Win the Apocalypse ‖ Suddenly zombies are everywhere. From graphic novels to Hollywood, from academic treatises asking us to consider the real-world implications of a zombie invasion to prime time television series. The undead haunt us as never before. The most common scholarly responses to the irruption of zombie popularity have noted the more than coincidental association with 9/11. Put simply, American popular culture has reacted to 9/11, for a variety of reasons identified by scholars, by churning out tales of a zombie apocalypse much as it had, though to a lesser extent, when the zombie film first emerged as a response and reaction to the cold war in the 1950s. Taken literally, the zombie invasion of course threatens American (and the world‘s) very survival. It becomes a game changer. It calls for entirely new rules, the emerging new roles of zombie interpretation suggest. Or does it? The phenomenon of the apparently unprecedented zombie onslaught in the wake of and as a response to 9/11, likely reflects something far more prosaic—in other words, a continuance more than a rupture. For example, AMC‘s hugely popular dystopic zombie series, TheWalking Dead, set in real time in the American south, relies on the deepest of American narrative tropes—the frontier cowboy, to carry its story of resistance and rebirth. In this way, while zombies may conjure up a fright symbolically akin to that rendered by 9/11 (or the martial response to 9/11), or may have been feasting on American trauma borne of 9/11 (or to the trauma of the ensuing wars), not to worry, the cowboy—that is, in the serie, Rick—can still best solve America‘s (and thereby the world‘s) problems. As such, The Walking Dead is really fairly banal, a classic example of adapting an age-old genre to fit contemporary events. This cuts two ways because, yes, it fits the classic zombie mold. But it runs deeper, too, because the frontier tale in fact is America‘s birth story, as old as the settler nation itself. In other words, The Walking Dead serves the highly useful purpose of symbolic rebirth, American-style. Cowboy Rick plays the role of proto American messiah. My paper explores how and why zombies ultimately stand no chance against Rick, The Walking Dead‘s cowboy protagonist, Carl, Rick‘s son and cowboy-in-the-making.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.538
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Scientific Journal ESJSame topicGothic Literature and Media AnalysisFrench-language works237,207